Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Allan Crounse's avatar

Hi James,

Thanks, as always, for sharing your perspective.

Personally, I'm not sure about "doesn't-matter-ism" being a bad or problematically anti-truth stance. I think it is perfectly valid to believe that the religious truth of the world is that being kind to people is what matters. It's not that far from Christianity to reduce all the teachings to "love thy neighbor" and treat the rest as optional commentary—it's not *at all* Christian, but it is a belief system. If that belief system helps explain the world better than alternatives, then it is reasonable to believe it is probably correct.

And there's no law of physics stating that you have to believe the official doctrine(s) of a religion to want to belong to it; if you do not believe that Catholic doctrine is actually correct, there is nothing objectively wrong with viewing Catholicism as a cultural movement in which some people have weird beliefs about how to be Catholic (specifically, those "weird ones" in this case are the adherents to the official faith).

Or in other words, nothing stops you from believing that "Catholic" describes a group of people with shared lifestyle choices who like the advice of the Pope; that is a worldview that is just as valid as the view that Catholic doctrine expresses what is objectively correct.

Of course, if you believe in Catholic doctrine, you would not consider these people to be following the true faith that God intended, but as the name "Catholic" was not, to my knowledge, ordained by God Himself, no one has a monopoly on what is really "Catholic".

For context, I say this as an agnostic atheist who thinks that any belief in God is almost certainly wrong. I also wish that people interrogated and lived by the truth more fully. But many forms of "doesn't-matter-ism" have the potential to be genuine answers to the big questions.

EDIT: Upon reflection, this kind of boils down to "doesn't-matter-ism isn't necessarily just a lack of reflection on truth; it's just a different religion of the MTD sort." Which is still objectively incorrect, from a Catholic or atheist perspective, but potentially only as incorrect as other genuine truth-seekers.

Richard M Doerflinger's avatar

And it's amazing that the religion of "science" (really scientism) has no plausible answer to any of those questions.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?